HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '17 at 11:19
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 40.9
2-Core 65.2
40% 58.2 Pts
4-Core 84
8-Core 81.7
11% 82.8 Pts
64-Core 83.3
5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP40 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 96.4
Mixed 23.3
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.59
122% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3402111AS 40GB
37GB free
Firmware: 3.ADH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 52.3
Write 51.7
Mixed 14.9
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.38
87% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 RMR1810ED48E7F1333 4GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3000 Small Form Factor PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 18% - Very poor Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback