EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime71.5 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 17:51
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 546
55% 445 Pts
64-Core 1,194
74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.4% Excellent
Lighting 99.7
Reflection 116
Parallax 102
81% 106 fps
MRender 99.1
Gravity 101
Splatting 90.9
79% 96.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$103
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 124 123 123 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 323
Write 200
Mixed 230
SusWrite 122
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 27.8
91% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 93.3
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 30.7
53% 100 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 137%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
834GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1058 1069 1070 1071 1071 1060 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 1,069
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,066
257% 1,142 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 64.9
209% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 396
DQ Mixed 451
338% 453 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 204%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
759GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 114 110 114 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 117
Write 46.2
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 114
61% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 75%
JMicron 1TB
900GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 60 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 130
Write 122
Mixed 79.9
SusWrite 61.3
127% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 68%
JMicron 750GB
584GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 59 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 102
Write 82.2
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 61
98% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-033.A00LF 5x4GB
5 of 18 slots used
20GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 11% 9 111 8 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27F6 ASUS VE278
Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback