Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration312 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 311
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 900
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,109
69% 1,109 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 89
Parallax 84.1
79% 89.9 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 81
Splatting 71.9
72% 90 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1310 1033 954 883 1015 1049 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,553
Write 2,295
Mixed 1,625
SusWrite 1,041
420% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 66.1
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 97.2
332% 122 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 1,250
DQ Mixed 1,296
976% 1,305 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 327%
Great: 372%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
481GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 912 528 485 488 488 488 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,354
Write 745
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 565
207% 929 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 85.2
284% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,075
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 429
437% 720 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 216%
Great: 311%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
4TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 2.7 5.3 9.6 14 3.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 804
Write 4.7
SusWrite 6.4
194% 272 MB/s
4K Read 238
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
10,049% 80 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 160 164 173 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 114
Write 132
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 163
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
269% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 94%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 42 43 31 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
3TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 121 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 131
Write 128
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 120
130% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2OZ 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.5
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 29.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 46: 8R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
46% 32% 31 327 251 60 52" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 6,187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback