Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics4.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 11:49
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Memory 21.1
1-Core 10.1
2-Core 25
12% 18.7 Pts
4-Core 31.6
8-Core 36.3
4% 34 Pts
64-Core 36.8
2% 36.8 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 7.6
6% 5.43 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 3.2
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS606 256GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0130B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 95 56 42 53 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 277
Write 296
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 84.3
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 23
4K Mixed 15.4
55% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 9.9
30% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ASBD308GB-WIN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 2 60 15.5" 1028 720 BOE0872
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback