Today's hottest deals

Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT1234567890
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 20:15
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 181
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 278
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 92
Parallax 80.2
49% 77.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 45
46% 57.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 35 36 30 28 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 221
Write 204
Mixed 183
SusWrite 43.7
36% 163 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 12
48% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 29.2
27% 40.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
83GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 67 68 71 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 93
Write 49.4
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 68.4
40% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 74%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB
103GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 26 26 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 24.4
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 25.4
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 00 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 19" 1280 720 MIG1900 E2019
Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback