HP Compaq dx2390 Microtower

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dx2390 Microtower  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A78h
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 05:59
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5500
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 47.3
31% 43.7 Pts
4-Core 41.6
8-Core 68.4
7% 55 Pts
64-Core 73.4
4% 73.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8440) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 11.8
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 13.7
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 93 100 102 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 63.5
Write 94.8
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 98.3
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
74GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 61 51 50 55 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 52
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 52.6
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
39% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST1000VX001-1HH162 1TB
520GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 62 62 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 87.7
Write 84.8
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 60.5
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 99%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1 1TB
313GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 13 17 12 19 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.79% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 11.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 15.2
16% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.79%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.4
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq dx2390 Microtower Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dx2390 Microtower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback