Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 06:46
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 684
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 919
57% 919 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.1% Below average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 62.5
Parallax 38.5
39% 49.5 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 45
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 423 433 441 237 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 471
Write 419
Mixed 351
SusWrite 343
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 27.1
128% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 35.5
74% 150 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 78%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
83GB free
Firmware: S3900100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 186 76 68 71 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 465
Write 350
Mixed 358
SusWrite 148
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 13.7
120% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 31.6
91% 190 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 100%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$50
854GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 116 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 124
Write 109
Mixed 109
SusWrite 117
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
169% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/4GX KHX3000C15D4/4GX KHX3200C16D4/4GX KHX3000C15D4/4GX 16GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 36.8
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 32.9
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 19% 26 108 4 60 23.8" 1920 1080 PHLC155 PHL 243V7
History: Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 9: 0R 2G 3B
Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback