HP 860-014

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 860-014 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4B
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 06:59
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 177 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 653 61% 510 Pts	64-Core 653 40% 653 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.8% Poor	Lighting 35.9 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 38.7 29% 38.8 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 28 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 318 213 191 181 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 429 Write 387 Mixed 365 SusWrite 246 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 47.6 149% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 330 249% 333 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 181 179 180 180 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 140 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 179 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 15.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 23: 1R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
23%	14%	94	109	6	60	23.8"	1920 1080	HPN3500 HP 24ec

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 860-014 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: HP 860-014

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	26x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	4x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	4x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
WDBNCE0010PNC 1TBWDCBench 97%, 21,221 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
M378A5143DB0-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 12GBSamsungBench 58%, 113 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GBCorsairBench 69%, 3,147 samples	3x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 12GBHynixBench 55%, 50 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16