Gigabyte GA-H81M-H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-H  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$87
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 294
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3540
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.6
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 19 41 378 23 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 468
Write 422
Mixed 377
SusWrite 141
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 19.2
118% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 36.6
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston HP698650-154-MCN 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-H Builds (Compare 1,376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-H - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $344
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback