Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime73.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 19:31
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 68.4
2-Core 125
52% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 395
38% 314 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.95% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 5.9
3% 7.43 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.95%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
282GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 17 11 16 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$38
422GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 77 82 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 78.1
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 79.2
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.4% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.1
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 6R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 13% 75 68 55 60 17.3" 1920 1080 CMN1735
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 11: 2R 0G 1B | Score 38: 6R 2G 2B
Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 575 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback