Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 139% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	40.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 20:06
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 90.6 1-Core 152 2-Core 304 99% 182 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 1139 103% 867 Pts	64-Core 2,725 169% 2,725 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 404B) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (142 fps cap detected)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 142 Parallax 142 115% 142 fps	MRender 142 Gravity 142 Splatting 142 116% 142 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105 327,441 User benchmarks, average bench 385% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2061 1399 947 1489 1078 1026 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	327% Outstanding	Read 2,542 Write 3,099 Mixed 1523 SusWrite 1,333 477% 2,124 MB/s	4K Read 54.9 4K Write 204 4K Mixed 79.3 292% 113 MB/s	DQ Read 1301 DQ Write 1,139 DQ Mixed 1,145 879% 1,195 MB/s
Poor: 266% ↑ This bench: 327% Great: 477%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 167GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1406 972 880 822 794 761 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	307% Outstanding	Read 2512 Write 2,398 Mixed 1,785 SusWrite 939 427% 1,908 MB/s	4K Read 65.3 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 91.1 303% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1,330 DQ Write 1,141 DQ Mixed 1,214 916% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 307% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 87GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,524 Write 2,356 Mixed 1,724 490% 2,201 MB/s	4K Read 67.4 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 92.4 308% 108 MB/s	DQ Read 1,351 DQ Write 1,158 DQ Mixed 1,234 930% 1,248 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 338GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 462 462 462 461 460 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	119% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 454 Mixed 411 SusWrite 462 103% 456 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 59.4 196% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 219 165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 119% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 34GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 463 404 288 179 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 455 Mixed 406 SusWrite 376 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 59.5 197% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 220 165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 82GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 97 100 98 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 48.2 Write 79.2 Mixed 59 SusWrite 98.9 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.4 110% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 368GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 111 109 113 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 101 Write 130 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 113 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.6 189% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 F4-4266C19-8GTZR CMK32GX4M2D3000C16 F4-4266C19-8GTZR 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	140% Outstanding	MC Read 86.4 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 38.7 155% 54.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 35.3 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 140%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 2R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	60%	25	57	8	144	27"	2560 1440	ACI27EC ROG PG279Q

History: Score 37: 3R 6G 4B | Score 33: 2R 5G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 164%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 187%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $213

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	400x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $240Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	386x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $176Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	336x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	271x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,135Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	153x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	146x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	172x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	115x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	71x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	122x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	68x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359