Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 90FN000EUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90FN000EUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 0x36C017AA
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 204
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 376D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9.3
7% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
612GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 99 57 56 71 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 157
Write 163
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 76.1
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00 120GB
112GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 32 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 34.9
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 34.1
41% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.9
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 4% 46 88 63 75 21.5" 1920 1080 LEN66AF C22-25
Typical 90FN000EUK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90FN000EUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback