Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJul 03 '21 at 12:24
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 69.5
34% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 189
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 198E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 44.4
Parallax 3.4
2% 16.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.8% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 61.5
Parallax 47.7
35% 50.6 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 39
Splatting 43.1
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$47
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 178 192 207 139 192 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 153
Write 186
Mixed 184
SusWrite 183
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 14.8
48% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 259
204% 283 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 125%
ASMT 2115 1TB
212GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 23 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 26.1
Write 23.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 24.3
33% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1315 CT51264BD160BJ.M8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 0.9
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 10R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 21% 66 101 13 60 18.5" 1366 768 FUS0849 L19T-4 LED
History: Score 38: 3R 5G 8B | Score 60: 10R 3G 1B
Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP) Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback