Acer Aspire XC-215

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-215  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-215
Memory5.3 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 53.6
21% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 75.8
8-Core 77.2
10% 76.5 Pts
64-Core 104
6% 104 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 0800) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$54
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 213 184 262 233 307 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 394
Write 324
Mixed 345
SusWrite 247
74% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 19.5
75% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 134
102% 138 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 Corsair CML16GX3M2A1600C10 9GB
1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.6
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 3R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 25% 16 10 4 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0794 SA300/SA350
Typical Aspire XC-215 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-215

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback