PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B98 |
Motherboard | MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191225 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 06 '21 at 13:10 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 65% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
|
33.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 68 73 66 118 60 MB/s
|
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
696GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 68 69 67 69 MB/s
|
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
11GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 7.4 6.4 7 6.6 MB/s
|
4.72%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 5 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | BNQ78DB BenQ GW2270 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $245Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 8,190x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 7,934x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 3,840x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2,441x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 2,360x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 2,167x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $817 |