Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X+ Killer  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '17 at 18:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 122
55% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 203
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6.77
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 13.4
6% 9.25 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 7.17
6% 6.95 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 166
Mixed 166
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.17
78% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 114%
Asrock 3TB+ Unlocker 802GB
706GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 118
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R938G2130U2S 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback