J2 680

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJ2 680  (all builds)
MotherboardJ2 C92
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120913
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 09:33
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 119
56% 89 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 125
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AM001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 84 89 89 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87.3
Write 89.3
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 85.6
53% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD3LHT4GE5WB-CKGAC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback