Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5800-$58 8,890 User benchmarks, average bench 37% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 90.2 37% 61.9 Pts	4-Core 91.9 8-Core 90 12% 90.9 Pts	64-Core 90.8 6% 90.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT 4,580 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 230B) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 0.6 0% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 1TB 870GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 50 30 37 33 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 100 Write 90.6 Mixed 57 SusWrite 42.1 16% 72.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 4% 1.3 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1870EF48E8W1333 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 4GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium E5800Intel $58Bench 37%, 8,890 samples	8x
Core i7-8700KIntel«Bench 35%, 2 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	1x

GPU
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	4x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
SSDSA2MH160G1GC 160GBIntelBench 23%, 124 samples	1x
SU700 240GBAdataBench 64%, 791 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
RMR1870EF48E8W1333 RMR1870EF48E8W1333 4GBUnknownBench 19%, 100 samples	3x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	2x
99U5471-034.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 1,322 samples	2x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $58

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16