Asus WS E900 G4_WS980T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive20.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus WS E900 G4_WS980T  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory754.9 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 74%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6246R
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 1,024
91% 768 Pts
64-Core 4,399
272% 4,399 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago AsustekPIKE3108 5TB
4.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 42 42 41 39 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.4% Poor
Read 232
Write 42.9
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 41.7
22% 99 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 7
28% 8.17 MB/s
Kingston SKC2500M82000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: S7781101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 745 686 732 573 506 682 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 787
Write 570
Mixed 623
SusWrite 654
148% 658 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 32.9
102% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 1,201
DQ Write 875
DQ Mixed 666
598% 914 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 149%
Great: 395%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA8GL7CPR4N-WM 12x31.9GB
12 of 12 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
161% Outstanding
MC Read 62.3
MC Write 81
MC Mixed 62.6
196% 68.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 161%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 0" 1028 720
Typical WS E900 G4_WS980T Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus WS E900 G4_WS980T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback