Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140704
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '17 at 17:52
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 134
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 522
47% 394 Pts
64-Core 750
46% 750 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 111
Parallax 92.4
75% 98.4 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 92
Splatting 94.3
77% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 518
Write 470
Mixed 505
111% 498 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 23.1
115% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 63.9
55% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 118%
Patriot Inferno 120GB
157GB free
Firmware: 363A13F0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
Read 587
Write 331
Mixed 370
95% 429 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 18.4
67% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 60.6
62% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 70%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
157GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
157GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 77%
Apple SM256E 251GB
94GB free
Firmware: CXM09A1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.6% Above average
Read 261
Write 247
Mixed 256
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 19.4
73% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 60.2
63% 104 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback