Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 02:19
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 470
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 21.1
0% 11.6 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 14
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
611GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2OA7T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 48 60 31 26 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 12.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 41.1
17% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.1
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/4G KHX2400C15/8G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 24" 1280 720 DEL4091 DELL E2414H
Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback