Asus G75VW

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G75VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G75VW
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120615
Uptime	7.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 06:14
Run Duration	478 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 158 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 430 45% 360 Pts	64-Core 424 26% 424 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 2115) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.59% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 12.4 Parallax 10.9 7% 10.6 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 11 Splatting 9.7 9% 11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.59% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LH960HAJR-00005 960GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: HXT7404Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 444 437 435 437 439 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 458 Write 433 Mixed 393 SusWrite 442 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 31.3 101% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 184 176% 273 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 126%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 298GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 41 41 40 39 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 70.9 Write 68.2 Mixed 45.1 SusWrite 39.8 41% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.6% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.6 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 3R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	9%	130	113	54	60	17.2"	1600 900	AUO129E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G75VW Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G75VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	348x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	249x
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	343x
GTX 670MNvidiaBench 10%, 2,951 samples	276x
GeForce GTX 770NvidiaBench 9%, 2 samples	1x

SSD
LAT-256M3S 256GBLiteonitBench 75%, 575 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 2x4GBElpidaBench 48%, 3,420 samples	66x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	61x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16