Lenovo 90H7007MAU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 90H7007MAU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 36D9
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 04:45
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 227
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 572
63% 495 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 39.4
Parallax 37
28% 37.1 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 26.4
27% 33.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 78 101 95 102 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 222
Write 211
Mixed 174
SusWrite 99.5
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 29.8
97% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 134
112% 159 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
122GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 284 293 290 294 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 308
Write 186
Mixed 256
SusWrite 294
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 27.3
102% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 208
170% 242 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 102%
WD Elements SE 25FE 1TB
51GB free, PID 25fe
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 54 55 77 107 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 90.8
Write 84.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 73.8
103% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.4
160% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110MB78HAF2400 Kingston 99U5702-089.A00G 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.2% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 1R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 29% 51 267 178 60 23.5" 1920 1080 AOC2470 2470W
Typical 90H7007MAU Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90H7007MAU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $300
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback