MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 58
2-Core 113
50% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 187
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 10.7
6% 8.27 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 7.7
6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 255 255 259 257 257 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 416
Write 299
Mixed 260
SusWrite 260
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 30.4
102% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 160
149% 234 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 111%
ST332041 8AS 320GB
175GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 32 33 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 29.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 31.7
39% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.8% Poor
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 12.6" 1280 720 NCS2275
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback