Today's hottest deals

Asus Rampage III Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage III Extreme  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 18:10
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 980-$148
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 482
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 627
39% 627 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Gigabyte(1458 3515) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 19.4
17% 22.8 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 22.6
Splatting 20
19% 23.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 60 64 62 87 103 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.7% Poor
Read 168
Write 41.9
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 76
21% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 15
51% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 42.1
DQ Mixed 26.2
22% 30.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 134%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
102GB free
Firmware: 520ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 119 117 118 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 200
Write 138
Mixed 150
SusWrite 117
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 22.8
73% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 31.4
27% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 98 104 106 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 125
Write 130
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 100
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 92 96 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 146
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 95.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$112
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.73% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 18.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 0.7
12% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 6.73%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
34GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 4.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 0.1
2% 2.78 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91
968GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 98 104 107 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 142
Write 101
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 100
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17" 1280 720 DDL0000 M17SB
Typical Rampage III Extreme Builds (Compare 772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus Rampage III Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback