Asrock 990FX Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '21 at 19:33
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 130
59% 95 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 362
36% 296 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 42 45 70 50 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 221
Write 179
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 64.1
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 9.3
33% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.3
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 13.8
21% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
756GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 150 150 150 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 108
Write 142
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 141
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 6R 0G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 27% 52 229 120 60 0" 1440 900
History: Score 25: 2R 4G 3B | Score 38: 6R 0G 8B
Typical 990FX Extreme4 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme4 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $602
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback