Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H61M-HG4 (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130711
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration	300 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 88.3 2-Core 172 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 290 37% 282 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0152) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 14 39 12 9.8 63 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.3% Poor	Read 191 Write 86 Mixed 79.4 SusWrite 34.8 22% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 9.7 39% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.3 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 336GB free Firmware: 06.01D02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 119 119 119 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 123 Write 115 Mixed 76.9 SusWrite 119 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RZX-D3D10M1600B/8G 1x8GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.17 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
5%	9%	11	18	12	60	18.7"	1366 768	PHL1851 Philips 185Vw

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	35x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	18x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	15x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	7x
KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GBKingstonBench 42%, 6 samples	6x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16