HP ProBook 6570b

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 6570b  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 17AB
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190415
Uptime86.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 147
54% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 214
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 17AB) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 2
Parallax 3
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 205 225 221 217 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 412
Write 303
Mixed 244
SusWrite 218
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 16.9
61% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 89.9
DQ Mixed 119
99% 146 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 73%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
11GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 4.9 7.2 7.1 3.3 8.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4
Write 3.8
SusWrite 5.2
6% 4.33 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 01BA 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 12.2
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 6570b Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 6570b

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback