Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80B0
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190527
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 19:50
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 55.9
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 67.4
36% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 93.2
8-Core 88.9
12% 91.1 Pts
64-Core 106
6% 106 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 80B0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.73 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5
Splatting 6.1
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 78 78 77 73 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 114
Write 92.8
Mixed 112
SusWrite 78.4
22% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 16.8
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 66.1
61% 94 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42
153GB free
Firmware: D005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 90 90 89 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 90.7
Write 88.9
Mixed 43.5
SusWrite 89
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 14.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 3% 34 52 35 60 17.3" 1600 900 SDC3754
History: Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 5: 1R 0G 0B
Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 9,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback