Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory54.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 02:14
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 166
2-Core 328
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 1,094
105% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1220 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 31.4
17% 26.5 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 25
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1744 1899 1288 1501 1732 1730 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 3826
Write 2457
Mixed 2,370
SusWrite 1,649
574% 2,576 MB/s
4K Read 57.4
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 80.9
268% 95.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,267
DQ Write 912
DQ Mixed 912
730% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 386%
Great: 375%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
792GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 431 424 431 426 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 448
Mixed 431
SusWrite 430
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 57.6
193% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
2TB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 113 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 113
140% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 8.6
4K Mixed 0.8
322% 3.33 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 0.5
331% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 64%
SSK 1TB
931GB free, PID 0562
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 255 255 255 255 255 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 253
Mixed 238
SusWrite 255
340% 246 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 43.5
3,609% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 48.4
4,226% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 279%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G36C16U4B.M8FB1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 41.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 33.6
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 40.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 82 7 60 27.2" 1920 1080 GSM5B09 LG Ultra HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback