Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 189 63% 112 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 565 56% 460 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 79%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 16 (AA) Unknown 99 99 491 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 1 (AE) Unknown 99 99 2 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 62 31 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0
Poor: 74% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH Hynix HMA41GR7AFR4N-UH M393A1G40DB0-CPB 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2400, 2400, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.2% Good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 22.4 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 15.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	757x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	383x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	223x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	147x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	131x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	122x

RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples	188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples	180x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	161x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440