Today's hottest deals

Eurocom X5 R2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEurocom X5 R2  (all builds)
MotherboardEUROCOM X5 R2
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930MX
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 586
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 with Max-Q Design
Clevo(1558 7481) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6611
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 64.5
58% 68 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 69.3
56% 69 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 201 211 219 212 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 426
Write 343
Mixed 301
SusWrite 233
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 14.6
76% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 32.3
42% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 61%
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB
58GB free
Firmware: CXM13D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 167 167 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 449
Write 168
Mixed 231
SusWrite 167
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 20.7
89% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 93.2
86% 138 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 62%
WD Red 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$125
473GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 96 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 95.6
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.7
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 CMO1720
Typical X5 R2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

System: Eurocom X5 R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback