Today's hottest deals

iEi SAP3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemiEi SAP3  (all builds)
MotherboardiEi SAP3
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '21 at 21:54
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
ZHAOXIN KaiXian KX-U6580@2.5GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 34.7
2-Core 69.4
39% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 272
24% 205 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 47.9
Parallax 38.1
30% 41 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 281 254 243 250 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 420
Write 320
Mixed 241
SusWrite 254
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 28.3
94% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 178
142% 196 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 25" 1280 720 ACI25F1 ASUS VE258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback