Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C75D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '17 at 03:07
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 51 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 61.6 31% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 119 8-Core 118 16% 118 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA85) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 2.88 2% 3.07 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.13 2% 2.52 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1429 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 21 (64) Unknown 100 100 444432 (65) Unknown 100 100 31728 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 4 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 192 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 747 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 37 100 171800002597 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 1 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1156 (EA) Unknown 100 100 278 (F1) Unknown 100 100 555 (F2) Unknown 100 100 407 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 7	46.4% Average	Read 442 Write 211 Mixed 194 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 18 4K Mixed 8.07 51% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 22.2 DQ Write 21.6 DQ Mixed 7.03 9% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 84GB free Firmware: AX0A4M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1706 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2817 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 20237 (0A) Spinup retry count 156 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1346 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 583841 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 25 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 84102 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210454642719 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 62 62 15377 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 270 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	43.2% Average	Read 76.4 Write 74.3 Mixed 62.2 53% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.17 57% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 57%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2.5TB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 24.6 Mixed 26 33% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.22 26% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1334 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.4 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 157 26% 157 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C75D-A Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C75D-A

CPU
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	15x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	15x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
LCS-128M6S 2.5 128GBLiteonitBench 78%, 3,907 samples	1x
SSD 240GB240gbBench 60%, 2,356 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	4x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	2x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 18,159 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359