Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 10:55
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 186
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 438
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 28
Parallax 21.8
13% 22 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20
17% 21 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 422 413 450 461 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 392
Mixed 318
SusWrite 436
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 35.9
129% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 299
240% 336 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 111%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
11GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 110 102 109 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 93.1
Write 72
Mixed 64
SusWrite 109
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
282% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 108%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
7.45% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 10.8
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 10.6
16% 14 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.45%
Great: 7%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
3GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 50 54 56 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 27.7
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 52.7
45% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-153.A 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 19.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 1R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 15% 52 104 6 60 26" 1280 720 CVT0003 CVTE TV
Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback