Positivo G800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo G800  (all builds)
MotherboardPOSITIVO G800
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 70
2-Core 121
51% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 167
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2033) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2HTH2BT480GB 480GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 382 425 351 138 278 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 434
Write 234
Mixed 325
SusWrite 320
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 24.5
85% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 191
169% 251 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 124 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 97.9
Write 97.9
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 123
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TI9C5S05H41159 0416 FSFF65F-C8KL9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 40% 5 16 6 60 13.9" 1366 768 BOE05C7
Typical G800 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo G800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback