Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 140
47% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 564
50% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,107
68% 1,107 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 471.21
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.63 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$110
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 357 379 380 384 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 468
Write 376
Mixed 313
SusWrite 369
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.2
102% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 192
171% 257 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.5% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 VSCE635 VX3276-QHD
Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback