Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87FD
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210219
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 07 '21 at 12:54
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 6305
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 67
2-Core 112
48% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 133
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 15
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 14.6
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 592 648 544 671 586 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 996
Write 693
Mixed 674
SusWrite 600
166% 741 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 42.3
144% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 233
174% 233 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 131%
Great: 202%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 5R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 38% 13 137 93 60 14" 1366 768 BOE092B
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 25: 5R 0G 0B
Typical Laptop 14s-dq2xxx Builds (Compare 918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 14s-dq2xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback