Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory115.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 03:48
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 153
2-Core 304
91% 174 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,008
94% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,443
89% 1,443 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
212% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 300
Parallax 330
252% 313 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 262
Splatting 192
213% 272 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 212%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 411 445 442 446 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 313
Mixed 260
SusWrite 426
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 45.1
160% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 128
97% 131 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 115%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
422GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1254 842 845 846 843 843 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,026
Write 2,213
Mixed 1719
SusWrite 912
386% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 75.4
267% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,365
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,219
920% 1235 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 274%
Great: 297%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$320
3TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 454 457 458 457 455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 446
Mixed 347
SusWrite 452
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 45.9
160% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 138
98% 125 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 137%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 135 133 135 133 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 134
Write 141
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 132
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 90%
Sabrent Disk Dev 4TB
992GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 127 122 122 118 121 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 110%
Sabrent Disk Dev 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 125 126 123 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 129
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 126
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 111%
H/W DISK 1 12TB
433GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 109
Write 123
Mixed 70
SusWrite 48.2
115% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.7
243% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%
H/W DISK 2 12TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 48.1
135% 106 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.2
539% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 14.5
DQ Mixed 1.8
564% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 95%
H/W DISK 3 12TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 48.1
124% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
230% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK128GX4M4E3200C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.3
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 25.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 7R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 37% 43 109 6 60 27" 2560 1440 DELF122 DELL P2721Q
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback