Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_M712DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_M712DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712DA
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 05:34
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
63% 116 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 524
50% 416 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 1BC1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.45.44
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 20.3
11% 15.2 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 11.4
10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 640 54 72 106 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 925
Write 870
Mixed 838
SusWrite 304
165% 734 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 53.5
177% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 554
DQ Mixed 133
183% 327 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 130%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A1K43CB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 22.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 40 6 60 17.3" 1920 1080 BOE084E
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_M712DA Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712DA_M712DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback