Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 11:19
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 130
2-Core 257
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 730
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.9% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.9%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 294 370 215 110 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 511
Write 400
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 254
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 4.6
73% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 24.3
78% 164 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8PT 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 12.6
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 8% 63 78 37 60 32" 1360 768 XMD004A Mi TV
History: Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 7: 0R 1G 4B
Typical PRIME H310M-CS R2.0 Builds (Compare 324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback