Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-551G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-551G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_KV
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '21 at 12:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FP3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 24.9
1-Core 34
2-Core 64.2
23% 41 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 106
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 105
6% 105 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Acer(1025 0864) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 154 155 144 173 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 364
Write 146
Mixed 195
SusWrite 153
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 13.3
57% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 57.3
61% 102 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 10.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 6.8
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 286
14% 286 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 4 60 15.5" 1366 768 AUO40EC
Typical Aspire E5-551G Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-551G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 13% - Very poor Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback