Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 05:39
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i5-10400F
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 242
74% 140 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 426
55% 415 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 8830) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
64.1% Good
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 238
Parallax 267
1% 169 fps
MRender 309
Gravity 234
Splatting 169
187% 238 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 30.2
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 0.9
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 27" 1280 720 DEL41B9 DELL U2720QM
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback