EVGA Classified SR-2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA Classified SR-2  (all builds)
Memory81.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '21 at 13:10
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 97.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 716
71% 578 Pts
64-Core 1,639
101% 1,639 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Gigabyte(1458 227C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 72.9
Parallax 91.9
54% 77.1 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 45.5
46% 58.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Svbus Virtual Hard Disk SCSI RAM Device 13GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,070
Write 1,604
Mixed 1,680
397% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 464
4K Write 423
4K Mixed 420
1,466% 436 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 757
DQ Mixed 823
613% 813 MB/s
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
197GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 245 243 245 206 244 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.1% Good
Read 255
Write 244
Mixed 222
SusWrite 238
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 58.2
4K Mixed 29.7
96% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 156
126% 175 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 103%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 152 157 158 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 150
Write 145
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 157
85% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 12x8GB
12 of 18 slots used
96GB DIMM 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.5% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 30.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 47.8
84% 47.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 2 75 21.7" 1280 720 ACR03E3
Typical Classified SR-2 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: EVGA Classified SR-2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $922
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback