Acer Aspire XC-330

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-330  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-330
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '21 at 19:26
Run Duration577 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-9120e RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2G
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 50.3
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 53.8
32% 47.8 Pts
4-Core 54.8
8-Core 54.1
7% 54.4 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Acer(1025 1216) 80MB
CLim: 626 MHz, MLim: 933 MHz, Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 2.6
1% 2.4 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 4.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
589GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 65 87 61 50 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 142
Write 105
Mixed 88.4
SusWrite 64.2
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.87 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 7R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 11% 88 19 14 72 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D2C C24F390
History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 11: 1R 1G 3B | Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 13: 1R 2G 2B | Score 16: 1R 3G 2B | Score 13: 2R 0G 3B | Score 16: 3R 0G 1B | Score 16: 2R 1G 3B | Score 40: 7R 1G 2B
Typical Aspire XC-330 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-330

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback