Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 190
61% 114 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 720
63% 536 Pts
64-Core 1,826
113% 1,826 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.9% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 71.5
42% 61.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 48.9
Splatting 50.7
45% 55.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256 256GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 120 128 121 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 233
Write 210
Mixed 144
SusWrite 124
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 22.9
82% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 56.8
65% 113 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 86%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: 20WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 210 210 208 208 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 226
Write 218
Mixed 186
SusWrite 209
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 28.1
95% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 160
121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 99%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
729GB free
Firmware: 1V02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 117 117 118 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 117
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
253GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 70.7
Write 68.8
Mixed 44
SusWrite 70.1
47% 63.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 61%
Fujitsu MHW2160B 160GB
120GB free
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 35.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 43.6
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%
Seagate STM3320418AS 320GB
70GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 94 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 94.8
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 94.8
63% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.9% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 33.9
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM07CE SMS27A350H
Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback