Asrock A320M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 72.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 222
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 617
64% 514 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 135
Parallax 124
102% 128 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 128
Splatting 115
93% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11130101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,985
Write 2,159
Mixed 1,741
439% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64
211% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 763
551% 719 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 278%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: CR100-10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.6
Write 14.3
Mixed 36.9
32% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 29.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $205
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback