Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '21 at 18:58
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 108
2-Core 222
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 723
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Sapphire(174B E269) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
7.84% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 14.2
8% 11.7 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 8.2
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.84%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190802a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 346 339 337 340 340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 351
Write 344
Mixed 302
SusWrite 341
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 28.8
110% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 191
158% 224 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 3G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 19% 36 32 7 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback