Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote LJ67 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote LJ67
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '21 at 11:34
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6600 8,673 User benchmarks, average bench 35% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 30.8 2-Core 23.1 32% 40.8 Pts	4-Core 59.9 8-Core 22.2 6% 41.1 Pts	64-Core 41.8 3% 41.8 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210M 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 020E) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8652 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1 Splatting 1 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: FG001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 30 35 33 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 9.5 Write 42.3 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 31.4 19% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 47% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.33 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM