Today's hottest deals

Emaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive51% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '21 at 14:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 140-$9
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.8% Average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 38.8
39% 51.8 Pts
4-Core 38.9
8-Core 39.7
5% 39.3 Pts
64-Core 38.7
2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a
Nvidia(10DE CB84) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S SD S800 240G 240GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RI15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 160 186 187 188 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
Read 228
Write 183
Mixed 195
SusWrite 170
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 16
97% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 31.7
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 22.9
32% 55.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$53
126GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 80 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 82.3
Write 81.8
Mixed 54
SusWrite 80.1
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-001.A01LF 9905474-029.A00LF 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.3% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.1
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-MCP61D3-iCafe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback